Choose an example of one aspect of contemporary culture that is, in your opinion, panoptic. Write an explanation of this, in approximately 400 words, employing key Foucauldian language, such as 'Docile Bodies' or 'self-regulation, and using not less than 5 quotes from the text 'Panopticism' in Thomas, J. (2000) 'Reading Images', NY, Palgrave McMillan.
refer also to the lecture, 'Panopticism' (25 /10 /12), and the accompanying seminar.
This also applies with contemporary surveillance to reinforce social
divisions. Citizens are watched with contemporary tactics,
which are enormously varied and would include a database for employers
containing the a persons details, home address, banking information and other
sensitive material. Similarly a supervisior on shift monitors behavior, emails
and phone calls in an office enviorment. Although they cannot be watching
everyone at all times, employees are aware of their presence and therefore act
accordingly. This is a situation most
employees would be familiar with and even aware of their resposnse to a person
in authority being nearby, yet probably wouldn’t consider it to be a form of
panopticism.
Moreover,
the likes of department stores and ATM cash machines use surveilence to monitor
users, such as cctv. Knowing that you are being watched means you are less
likely to steal or commit criminal activity. Even those that do chose to hide
their identity or remain some how out of sight. Crime prevention relies on many
panoptic tenchinques, surveilence just being the obvious, compulsory prevision
of DNA samping, drug and alcohol testing, even thermal imaging are all methods
put in place which affect societies behavior.
More sophisticated equipment allows scanners to pick up cellular and
cordless phone communication, for those making untoward phone calls, in some
cases they will be aware of their conversation being monitored, maybe using
code names or cryptic messages. Law
enforment are even permitted to use polygraphs to determine accuracy and honesty
with those providing information to them on cases by monitoring brain waves. Because of these
techniques, divisions in society are controlled, as it tends to be those of
upper class – politicians or governmental forces that seem to have the power
over the above techniques. Controlling the citizens in mass tends to leave to a
dispute between these hierarchies.
As
Foucault argues, the ‘panoptic gaze is used by
society to internalize the displiplne of the self, it internalize the rules and
regulations of the State in the social body.’ This therefore highlights that
the idea suggests that there is power circulating through social practices, and
that power is preserved through economical and technological statuses. With a rise in computer and internet
societies, people can develop new ways of information gathering and uprising,
with new forms of ‘the crowd’ in virtual form instead of physical presence as
society is produced and meditated in large parts by computer technology.
No comments:
Post a Comment